Monday, 10 June 2013

Ruth Davidson

Back to politics with a bump.

So who exactly is Ruth Davidson then? I'll tell you.


You see now, I'm being unoriginal; I've already done this gag - I'm being puerile all over again. Although, since making comparisons between Alex Salmond and North Korean dictators is OK, I'm going to let myself off.

This is she:


Any likeness is purely coincidental, although you can't say the same thing about political doctrine. You see Ruth and Kim have something in common - an extremely cavalier attitude to the workings of democracy.

Kim Jong-Un, son of Kim Jong-il among other things is the hereditary Supreme Ruler of North Korea, Chairman of the Central Military Commission, First Chairman of the National Defence Commission of North Korea, the Supreme Commander of the Korean People's Army and has been First Secretary of the Workers' Party of Korea. He has two degrees, one in physics and another in making war and being a bit of a nutter.

Ruth Davidson on the other hand is Glasgow Regional List MSP and the current leader of the Scottish Conservative & Unionist Party, she enjoys kickboxing (I hope she doesn't read this,) dog walking (apparently) and has a degree in English Lit from Edinburgh University.. In 2009 she was encouraged to stand for the Glasgow North East seat vacated by Labour MP and ex-Speaker of the House Michael Martin (who left under a cloud created by the expenses scandal.) Embarrassingly, she was beaten by Labour's Willie Bain, he of the 'Bain Principle' which states, all SNP policy must be opposed even if its also Labour policy - he's also a bit of a gonk.

Before becoming an MSP Ruth worked mainly for the BBC, having one more thing in common with Kim Jong-il insofar as - neither have had a job in the real world.

Anyway, I digress, the cavalier attitude to democracy - well - Kim wears his on his sleeve; its a bit obvious. Ruth on the other hand makes her feelings known during interviews and in speeches hidden within management consultancy hyperbole. Not wishing to bog folks down with detail, she started her leadership with a 'line in the sand'; there would be no more powers for Holyrood but more recently, has changed her tune. (Both links are from the Telegraph, a Tory newspaper if ever there was one...)

More recently (on Sunday Politics Scotland - last 20 minutes,) she has vowed to prevent any further referenda on independence should Scotland vote no in September 2014, she went on to say that Holyrood was broken because the SNP managed to get a majority in a voting system designed to disallow majorities, (Westminster on the other hand, where a party can win on a minority vote is working perfectly fine.) I think its safe to say, if any other party - say, a unionist one - got that majority; she'd be less vocal.

So, if uber-tory Ruth gets into power, she'll do her best to limit the democratic will of the people living in Scotland. She's starting with referenda on the constitution, what might be next?

Independence is a party policy, a pretty big one; but a policy never-the-less. Is it OK for a politician representing the party currently in power at Westminster to openly stifle democracy to the benefit of her own party and its expressed wishes? More-over, what will the Conservatives at Westminster do if Scotland rejects Independence this time round? It won't be pretty and if Ruth gets her way, there will be nothing you can do about it.

She has zero chance of getting into power at Holyrood, but the party which gives her her orders are already in the driving seat at Westminster, it can and most probably will neuter Holyrood after a no vote so that we'd be forever tethered to a failing Westminster system of government.

In her speech at the Tory conference in Stirling at the weekend there, Ruth wrapped up to a capacity crowd with the following words (among others):

"...And we will work for a Scotland that enjoys success everyone can share in...." (Not my emphasis.)

Ruth Davidson enjoying a well earned cup of tea after her speech to conference.

















Friday, 7 June 2013

More international frontiers.

I didn't want to sully yesterday's blog with politics but I did want to make a point about a frequently mentioned reason-for-voting-no-that-isn't-a-reason-for-voting-no; namely - border checkpoints and the threat there-of if you vote yes in the referendum.

Firstly, here are some pictures of other international frontiers, a real hodge-podge with borders between EU countries, borders between non-EU and EU countries and borders between non-EU countries around the globe.

I was also at a border recently (as you might know from the last blog) although I could be forgiven for not realising. I looked for signs which said I'd left the UK but there wasn't any, nor was I accosted and searched beneath machine guns and search lights - we just rode on through to the pub.

The pub.

I'm not saying there weren't problems mind... We had to tempt the Irish barman away from the TV - he was watching Top Gear on Dave - and ask if his establishment accepted Sterling; he said; yes, it did.

We ordered drinks and were horrified to have to wait for two minutes while he worked out the exchange rate on a solar powered calculator (yes, foreign countries* have solar powered calculators.) Even my friend there in the picture, worried that they wouldn't accept Sterling (he's Scottish but living in NI) but I said why wouldn't they? Its just different coloured money, it spends the same way does it not?

Also, it cost £4.50 for two cokes which even by Edinburgh standards is steep. If I'm being honest, I wasn't entirely confident the barman was proficient at working out exchange rates but do you know? I was just thrilled to be there. Crossing a border is still a bit of a novelty, I've been back and forth to England more times than I can remember but only been abroad maybe a dozen times, its hard to see borders when you're flying high above them so riding across one on a motorbike is still new to me.

So, I was a wee bit disappointed when I couldn't get a photo of the border, the only notification was a sign welcoming us to Donegal - on the way back there was a sign welcoming us to Northern Ireland - that was it. No swarthy border guards gleefully snapping on rubber gloves, no towers bristling with weaponry or barbed wire (I think most folk in NI are pissed off with that kind of thing anyway.)

In the face of incontrovertible photographic proof, demonstrable fact and not a little common sense, why would border controls be thrust up between England and Scotland on independence?

Answer?

It wouldn't because it makes no sense. We sell lots of stuff to England and they sell a ton of stuff to us, why would they or we mess with that? Why would Westminster (or Holyrood) throw up border controls between England and Scotland but have nothing between England & France or Scotland & Norway?

What would change? In terms of borders and how your money spends - precisely nothing. Now, some might say; why bother with it then? Because its not about borders and currency (well maybe a wee bit about currency,) its about policy and aspiration. Its about how much money you have in your pocket, how much of it government has a right to take and how much of it we allow them to piss up the wall - on that point, I would refer you to Mrs Howden.


* Although this has probably never occurred to you (and why would it,) Ireland as far as UK law is concerned, isn't a 'foreign' country - it's part of the UK CTA (Common Travel Area to us dafties) - you can come and go as you please. Given this is the case for Ireland and Scotland currently, why would that change exactly? Will Westminster, in a fit of pique, chuck a huff and throw up border controls?


Thursday, 6 June 2013

International Frontiers

The title of this sounds a lot more exciting than it actually is, the international frontier in question is that which exists between Northern Ireland and the Republic - specifically in a small town called Pettigo which straddles said frontier. So what is it about Pettigo that made me drag my pal who I was visiting in Northern Ireland to this small border town 130 miles away and to a point slightly beyond? Unfortunately I'm going to tell you.

It starts with a book called McCarthy's Bar by a man called Pete McCarthy, I read it a few years ago and have read it several times since. He wrote another book called The Road To McCarthy and I don't mind saying; its one of my most favourite reads - I've read it and McCarthy's Bar several times.

These are both humorous and informative travelogues about Ireland and the Irish diaspora. In McCarthy's Bar he sets out to discover what it is to be Irish and if you can somehow  be English and Irish at the same time. He does this - essentially - by travelling around Ireland and entering any bar that has his name above the door and having a drink.

In The Road to McCarthy, he starts in Tangiers hunting down the McCarthy Mor (the alleged descendant of an ancient Irish king) and ends in the tiny Alaskan town of McCarthy visiting Tasmania,  Montserrat, the United States and of course Ireland in between.

But it is McCarthy's Bar we're interested in, the climax takes place at St Patrick's Purgatory on - or perhaps in - Lough Derg; about 6 miles beyond the Irish town of Pettigo. Although not at all religious, he decided that in order to reconnect with his Irish roots, he might try participating in the ancient Lough Derg pilgrimage that people from across the world have been doing for over 1000 years.

Lasting three days, pilgrims must go with out food or drink (one Lough Derg meal is allowed each day consisting of dry toast and black tea.) They must also complete - in bare feet -  nine 'stations' (the remains of monastic cells or beds dedicated to the memory of mainly Irish Saints) over the three days, stations consist of kneeling at alters around the island and its buildings and saying certain prayers or liturgies - according to Pete's account - it didn't seem to matter what God or deity you directed your pleas at.

Since he spent the weeks leading up to his pilgrimage visiting a great many pubs around Ireland (many not necessarily having his name above the door,) the pilgrimage was more of a detox than a religious observance.

I love his books, the warmth and humour with which he tells his stories and shares his experiences is amiable yet deliciously dry. 

We didn't get to go out to the island itself, (you need to commit to a three day pilgrimage and frankly - my friend wasn't up for it.) We did get to stand on the dock where Pete left for his pilgrimage - or ordeal as I prefer to think of it. While I don't think my friend was overly enthused, I got a kick out of standing there knowing one of my favourite writers had been there years before while writing McCarthy's Bar.

Pete McCarthy died at the age of 52, he only managed two books before cancer took him down. While I would have preferred a third, fourth, fifth and at least sixth book, the two books he did write are a testament to his memory and an inspiration; I cannot recommend them enough.

St Patrick with St Patrick's Purgatory on Station Island in the background.

McCarthy's Bar - Pete McCarthy.

00.05 Day 2.

When I got to the dorm there were two fat guys getting layered up with fat clothes. They were discussing Chinese food with an intensity that bordered on sexual fantasy. They were clearly mad with hunger. The mention of Kung Po Prawns had one of them bent double, grimacing with lust. The sexiest Chinese and Malaysian food on the planet they reckoned was to be found in Tullamore. They're making elaborate plans to break their fast with a spectacular blow out of satay chicken, crispy duck, sweet & sour pork, beef in black bean sauce, and chilli crabs, to be delivered to their doors at midnight on Sunday. Perhaps they should consider skipping toast for the next couple of days, to make sure they've got an appetite.

I'm sitting in the night shelter at the back of the basilica where we can come between sessions of prayer of we don't fancy wandering outside barefoot in the pitch-black howling deluge. We're packed together on long benches, some smoking, some chatting and other sipping water. There's a woman over there reading Hello! magazine. I'd have thought that was against the rules. Perhaps there's some religious content though; exclusive shots of the ex-Bishop of Galway at home with his family, something like that.

Right opposite me, there's a bony woman who looks like she works in a fish shop. She's wearing leg warmers, which she's pulled down so that they cover her feet. That can't be allowed, can it? Surely she's cheating. It's not fair. I find myself wanting a priest to come and confiscate them. This thing is beginning to take on a momentum of its own. Even if you don't buy in to the philosophy, once you're here you find yourself playing by their rules. Something inside you takes over, and it becomes a matter of pride. You want to succeed, to score points, to finish the race, to accumulate the prayers. If they can do it, so can I.

I don't want to go on about it. I just think they should confiscate her leg warmers, that's all. I mean, it's not unreasonable is it?

It won't be light for another six hours.

I find myself thinking of something I did a couple of years ago in Australia, when I let an aging hippy called Graham bury me alive in the outback. The idea was that it was a kind of rebirthing, an initiation ceremony in which you'd break through your own barriers. of fear and discomfort and be born anew. You spend all day in a remote place in the New South Wales bush, digging what Graham comfortingly calls 'your own grave', then at sunset you get in it, while another hippy, who's just showed up in a van, plays the didgeridoo. Then Graham fills it in up to your neck, leaving just your head sticking out of the ground, like David Bowie in Merry Christmas Mr Lawrence, only not so badly made up. Then you're left to the mercy of the poisonous spiders you've been finding all day, the terrifying sounds of the Australian night, and the crushing weight of the soil. After covering my face with insect repellent,  Graham made a circle of salt on the ground around my neck. I asked him what it was for.

'To keep the leeches of your face.'

Up to this point, I hadn't considered the possibility of leeches on my face, which is what made this the worst moment of all. Anyway, the understanding was that I would stay in the ground as long as I could bear - all night if possible -  but that Graham was my buddy, so that when I asked to be released, he would comply. After a few hours I asked; and of course he refused, which is when the row began, with me just a ranting head sticking out the ground, like something from a Sam Beckett play.

But next day - even though I hated Graham, and never wanted to set eyes on the bastard again - I felt very good, at ease with myself and full of energy, and the feeling persisted for several days. Maybe it was just banging your head on the wall syndrome, and I was glad it had stopped; or maybe that the challenge of dealing with something i'd been dreading, and coming out the other side, had indeed done some good.

So perhaps being here tonight is like being buried alive in the Australian outback by a hippy. If I can somehow make myself see it through, maybe I'll reap the benefits of it - even if they're not the ones the priests might be intending. I did go into a kind of contemplative trance earlier, during some rather beautiful chanting in the basilica, and I came to one unexpected realisation. If I were them I'd order another seafood dish, and cancel the beef in black bean sauce.

Skinhead seems to be the enforcer round here, the bad priest in the old good-priest/bad-priest routine. He's just come in and told us time's up, back to our prayers. How did that old joke about hell go? 'All right lads, tea break over, back on your heads.'